You raise a legitimate concern, but this isn’t “the U.S. contingent”, it’s one small unit replacing another small unit. Plus, I’m speaking only of the detachment (one segment of the unit) that will be replacing the detachment from which I’ve been operating.
Set against that is the fact that I didn’t really consider those issues before making the post. I’ve been watching what I say for so long that it became habitual, which means I wasn’t consciously looking ahead to what such information might reveal about our replacements. In this instance, no harm (I haven’t been explicit about just what I do, and the replacements won’t necessarily be placing their teams in the same spots where we had ours), but it would have been better if I had kept such considerations in mind.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2006-04-11 02:56 pm (UTC)Set against that is the fact that I didn’t really consider those issues before making the post. I’ve been watching what I say for so long that it became habitual, which means I wasn’t consciously looking ahead to what such information might reveal about our replacements. In this instance, no harm (I haven’t been explicit about just what I do, and the replacements won’t necessarily be placing their teams in the same spots where we had ours), but it would have been better if I had kept such considerations in mind.